- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 19:08:52 +0100
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>, Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
* Terje Bless wrote: >Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > >>>I don't really see that there is a lot we can do about this. Until and >>>unless the HTML WG issues updated DTDs for XHTML 1.0 -- and we do have >>>DTDs that were updated after the specification went to REC and moved >>>into /TR! -- we need to play the hand we were dealt. That means using >>>Schema with XHTML 1.0 involves modifying the Internal Subset to include >>>the requisite attribute definitions. >> >>That'd make the XHTML 1.0 document invalid (or call it non strictly >>conforming) but the Validator does not report any errors. Bad Validator. >But as mentioned, if the HTML WG is willing to give me an excuse for it, >I'm willing to use modified DTDs to enable this. An errata on the XHTML 1.0 >Recommendation... A note from the HTML WG suggesting this is the intended >or desireable behaviour (cf. the TAG's recent penchant for issuing "formal >opinions")... etc. > >This has to come from the HTML WG; I can't make this change unilaterally! You are missing my point. The document <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" [ <!ATTLIST html xmlns:xsi CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation CDATA #IMPLIED > ]> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/xhtml1-strict.xsd"> <head><title></title></head><body><p>...</p></body> </html> is either invalid XHTML 1.0 Strict or as valid as <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/xhtml1-strict.xsd"> <head><title></title></head><body><p>...</p></body> </html> I'd be fine if the validator ignores the internal subset and thus claims both documents to be invalid.
Received on Saturday, 2 November 2002 13:08:40 UTC