www-tag@w3.org from February 2009 by author

Anne van Kesteren

Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)

ashok malhotra

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)

Ben Adida

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Bijan Parsia

Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Sunday, 15 February)

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)

RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Wednesday, 25 February)
RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Wednesday, 25 February)
RE: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)
RE: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Cullen Jennings

Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)

Dan Brickley

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: W3C TAG Finding "The Self-Describing Web" has been published (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)

Dan Connolly

Re: Fwd: FYI: Link -04 (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: "Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Tuesday, 24 February)
"Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)
http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: google, Microsoft, Yahoo support rel="canonical" (Wednesday, 18 February)
google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership (Tuesday, 17 February)
Palm webOS approach to HTML extensibility: x-mojo-* [issue-51 selfDescribingWeb-51] (Monday, 16 February)
TAG minutes 12 Feb for review: March meeting planning, metadata, WS-RA, link maintenance (Friday, 13 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
a little help with my trip to the March TAG meeting? (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)

David Orchard

Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Tuesday, 17 February)

Elliotte Harold

Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Friday, 13 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)

Eran Hammer-Lahav

RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
RE: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Monday, 23 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)
FW: I-D Action:draft-hammer-discovery-02.txt (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Wednesday, 4 February)
RE: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)
RE: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Sunday, 1 February)

Geoffrey Sneddon

Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)

Henri Sivonen

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Wednesday, 11 February)

Henry S. Thompson

Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Thursday, 5 February)

Ian Davis

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)

Ian Hickson

Re: HTML and XML (Friday, 13 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)

Jeff Sonstein

Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Sunday, 15 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 10 February)

John Kemp

Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Tuesday, 17 February)
Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: FYI: broken links in TAG finding uriMediaType-9 (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Jonathan Rees

Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (Thursday, 26 February)
Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (Wednesday, 25 February)
Metadata survey (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: a little help with my trip to the March TAG meeting? (Sunday, 15 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
Category errors (Tuesday, 10 February)
Draft of minutes from 5 February 2009 TAG telecon for review (Tuesday, 10 February)
Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Monday, 9 February)
Mild tweaks to 'http' scheme description for HTTPbis (Monday, 9 February)
Representation = entity in HTTPbis (Friday, 6 February)
Re: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Sunday, 1 February)

Julian Reschke

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Karl Dubost

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Larry Masinter

RE: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Tuesday, 24 February)
content negotiation in HTTP (Tuesday, 24 February)
RE: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 19 February)
RE: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Tuesday, 17 February)
RE: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
URN duri and tdb spec updated (Wednesday, 4 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Manu Sporny

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Mark Baker

Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)

Mark Nottingham

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: FYI: Link -04 (Thursday, 26 February)
Fwd: FYI: Link -04 (Wednesday, 25 February)
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-site-meta-01 (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Monday, 2 February)

Martin Nally

RE: What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Wednesday, 25 February)
RE: Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces (Tuesday, 24 February)
What resource does this URL identify? - http://mail.google.com/mail/#inbox/11f804dfae358bd9 (Tuesday, 24 February)
Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)

Michael Hausenblas

Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Thursday, 19 February)
Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)

Michael(tm) Smith

Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 10 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (Thursday, 26 February)
Re: Fwd: FYI: Link -04 (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (Wednesday, 25 February)
Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (Wednesday, 25 February)
Stuart Williams comments in TAG ISSUE-57 (httpRedirections-57) (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: "Content-Type Processing Model" draft 9 Jan (ISSUE-24 contentTypeOverride-24) (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Draft Minutes of the TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 (Tuesday, 24 February)
Draft Minutes of the TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 (Monday, 23 February)
No TAG Teleconference on 26 February 2009 -- suggestions for F2F preparation (Monday, 23 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)
Approved minutes of TAG Teleconference of 5 February 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
Approved minutes of TAG Teleconference of 22 January 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
RE: TAG review of EXI Best Practices (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 19 February 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: Formulate erratum text on versioning for the web architecture document (Tuesday, 17 February)
ISSUE-50: Please provide a status update on the URNS & Registries Issue (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 12 February 2009 (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: FYI: broken links in TAG finding uriMediaType-9 (Tuesday, 10 February)
TAG ISSUE-20: Error handling (Monday, 9 February)
W3C TAG Finding "The Self-Describing Web" has been published (Sunday, 8 February)
Re: editorial: assorted (Saturday, 7 February)
Re: editorial: unclear use/misuse of "link" (vs. "link to") (Saturday, 7 February)
Approved minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Friday, 6 February)
TAG Telcon Agenda for 5th February 2009 (Wednesday, 4 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Tuesday, 3 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Tuesday, 3 February)
RE: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Tuesday, 3 February)
RE: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Monday, 2 February)
Re: Reminder: POWDER Document Suite: Second Last Call Working Draft (Monday, 2 February)
Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Monday, 2 February)

Pat Hayes

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 26 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Monday, 16 February)

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Thursday, 26 February)
Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: (Thursday, 26 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Tuesday, 24 February)

Paul Cotton

RE: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (Monday, 2 February)

Paul Libbrecht

Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)

Paul Prescod

Re: HTML and XML (Tuesday, 17 February)
Re: Palm webOS approach to HTML extensibility: x-mojo-* [issue-51 selfDescribingWeb-51] (Monday, 16 February)

Phil Archer

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Metadata survey (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: Request for feedback: HTTP-based Resource Descriptor Discovery (Wednesday, 4 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Tuesday, 3 February)
Re: Reminder: POWDER Document Suite: Second Last Call Working Draft (Monday, 2 February)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)

Richard Cyganiak

Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Server and client burden for URIQA vs. Link: (Thursday, 26 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Thursday, 19 February)

Rob Sayre

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Robert J Burns

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: HTML and XML (Thursday, 12 February)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: Link: relation registry and 303 (Wednesday, 11 February)

Sam Ruby

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Sebastien Lambla

RE: Using Content Negotiation to relate "data resources" to AJAX user interfaces (Tuesday, 24 February)

Shane McCarron

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: google supports on rel="canonical" ISSUE-27 rel-ownership (Tuesday, 17 February)

Steven Pemberton

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Story Henry

Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)

T.V Raman

Re: HTML and XML (Wednesday, 11 February)

Thomas Roessler

Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)
Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Monday, 23 February)
Re: broken links in W3C documents and recommendations (Thursday, 12 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

Re: http+srv worth its own URI scheme? (ISSUE-49 schemeProtocols-49) (Tuesday, 24 February)
Re: Introduction to URIs (was RE: WebArch introduction, sort of) (Sunday, 1 February)

Toby A Inkster

Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Wednesday, 18 February)

Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)

RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
RE: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
RE: URN duri and tdb spec updated (Thursday, 12 February)
RE: Link: relation registry and 303 (Monday, 2 February)
RE: Link: relation registry and 303 (Monday, 2 February)

Xiaoshu Wang

Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Last minute input to discussion re 'on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data' (Friday, 20 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 19 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Monday, 16 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Friday, 13 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)
Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context of the Web of Data (Thursday, 12 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:50 UTC