- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:15:37 +0100
- To: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: <eran@hueniverse.com>, <jar@creativecommons.org>, <connolly@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2009-02-24 11:45, "ext Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: >> ... >> Agents which want to deal with authoritative metadata use MGET/MPUT/etc. >> ... > > Same with PROPFIND and PROPPATCH, btw. > > BR, Julian Yes. There is a lot of conceptual similarity between the URIQA and WebDAV methods for interacting with metadata, but I would not consider them close enough for it to be practical to use the WebDAV methods in place of the URIQA methods. The WebDAV semantics is much more specialized than URIQA. Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 10:14:31 UTC