Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

Rob Sayre wrote:
> On 2/27/09 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Hi Noah,
>> It seems to me that indeed the TAG should be actively involved, since 
>> the primary issue here is about architectural coordination.
> Many have suggested that the HTML WG work on a less ambitious initial 
> deliverable, and establish a pattern of quick iteration. This thread 
> shows that it might not make sense to gate HTML interoperability efforts 
> on XHTML coordination. I am not suggesting giving up on coordination, 
> but I do think some issues will need the amount of time Ian has 
> estimated for his document.
> You can Solve Any Problem... if you're willing to make the problem small 
> enough,

What concerns me more than coordination costs is that RDFa in text/html 
is proceeding:

- Sam Ruby

Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 22:11:54 UTC