Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

Henri Sivonen wrote:
> What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea

It is incorrect to use the term "erratum" to discuss a proposed major
change to a REC with numerous implementors and deployed markup that do
not consider this an error.

I am strongly opposed to this major change. I believe CURIEs and
link-types can co-exist just fine, as has been shown by existing
implementors including Creative Commons and Yahoo.


Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 17:22:58 UTC