- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:22:20 -0800
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote: > What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea It is incorrect to use the term "erratum" to discuss a proposed major change to a REC with numerous implementors and deployed markup that do not consider this an error. I am strongly opposed to this major change. I believe CURIEs and link-types can co-exist just fine, as has been shown by existing implementors including Creative Commons and Yahoo. -Ben
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 17:22:58 UTC