Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Indeed. However, the remedy of errataing RDFa to use full URIs instead 
> of CURIEs would address both that issue and the rel *value* issue Mark 
> Nottingham raised. (Well, at least if the full URIs used as rel tokens 
> do not have upper case letters A-Z.)
Sure.  However, CURIEs are NOT a mistake in a recommendation that could 
ever be "errated" out.  Any change of that magnitude would require a new 
version of the specification with corresponding review cycles, 
balloting, etc.  And I, at least, would object to such a change.

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet:

Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 14:45:16 UTC