On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>wrote:
>
>
> I don't think anyone would be happy if a .ttl were quietly substituted
> for a .png or vice versa. I bet it's possible to come up with
> particular .ttl/.png pairs where this might be possible (e.g. the .png
> is a scan of the .ttl), but I don't think your example is one of them.
I think they could be very happy if they were visually impaired and wanted
their aural browser to describe the thing depicted by the image
Ian