- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:41:50 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hi, Phil Archer said: > HTML doesn't support namespaces and so shouldn't be using Curies > anyway. If people do, it may lead to unexpected results. Some facts * There are discussions going on about putting RDFa in HTML 5 (read here text/html and application/xhtml+xml) with or without CURIE. http://rdfa.info/wiki/Rdfa-use-cases http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Feb/thread.html#msg18 * There is an experimental build of html 5 validation with RDFa minus CURIE http://validator.nu/ * Documents served as text/html and containing RDFa prose are already post-processed by RDFa parsers. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 12:41:59 UTC