- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:56:21 -0600
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 16:32 -0500, Jonathan Rees wrote: > Pursuant to ACTION-200 (XRD use case), requested by Dan C: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uniform-access-20090205.html#cross_site > > This is rather quick and dirty, so let me know how you'd like to see > it improved. It makes sense, though you correctly " anticipate that some will object that the information should have been put in the representation (i.e. found via GET)" also... "This is the approach taken by openid 1.0, which failed to get the uptake desired" really? I read just last week about usability work that lead to some 80% success rate at google or something. Maybe that's based on a related tweak... gotta get some food before our telcon... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2009 17:56:31 UTC