Re: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
> 2) However, it seems like RDFa is jumping the gun by assuming @rel is a 
> CURIE right now. This is not promoting interoperablity or shared 
> architecture, because no XHTML processor that isn't aware of RDFa can 
> properly identify these link relations. My preference would be an 
> erratum to RDFa removing this syntax, replacing them with a 
> self-contained identifier (i.e. a URI). Thoughts?
> ...

Indeed. See discussion from last September, around 

BR, Julian

Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 09:49:50 UTC