Re: Uniform access to metadata: XRD use case. wrote:
> ...
> Perhaps you should split URIQA from PROPFIND since your summary of PROPFIND
> does not correctly capture its properties, and suggests URIQA is essentially
> equivalent, which it clearly is not.
> ...

I think PROPFIND could be considered a superset, thus the functionality 
provided by MGET could potentially made available using PROPFIND, for 
instance with a new "description" property. (and, of course, MPUT and 
MDELETE could then be mapped to PROPPATCH).

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 17:06:23 UTC