- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:15:54 +1100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Yes, I would have sent that, but they tend to lag by a few days.... just now when I checked, they still had only -03. Cheers, On 26/02/2009, at 10:57 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 18:54 -0500, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: >> Thank you, Mark. I am going to update the link in the agenda for the >> upcoming TAG F2F to refer to the -04 version. > > For a meeting agenda, a dated link is probably best, but > if you wanted a "latest version" link, recall ISOC supports > those: > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/ > > I also recommend ISOC since they don't un-publish their > copies after 6 months. > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/all-ids/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-04.txt > >> >> Noah >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/03/03-agenda#httpRedirections >> [2] >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-04.txt > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 00:16:35 UTC