- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:09:14 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Feb 27, 2009, at 14:57, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Going back to the design of exposing text/html as if it were XML: As > I pointed out earlier, xmlns:foo in text/html parses, in existing > browsers and in the HTML5 parsing algorithm as drafted today, into a > [namespace, local] pair where the local part is not an NCName. This > characteristic alone (i.e. without even considering the part that is > spelled "xmlns") is enough to render the [namespace, local] pair > unrepresentable in XML 1.0 + Namespaces. > > This poses the following problems: > 1) A local name that is not an NCName cannot be serialized as XML > 1.0 in such a way that parsing the resulting XML document with a > namespace-aware parser round-trips the non-NCName local name properly. > 2) Namespace-wise strictly correct XML tree implementations throw if > you try to set an attribute that can't be serialized as XML 1.0 + > Namespaces. (A demo that makes XOM throw is included below my > signature.) > 3) Even if the API contract of an XML API could be violated and a > local name that is impossible in XML 1.0 + Namespaces could be > passed through, this representation would be *different* from the > way an XML parser would expose an attribute spelled "xmlns:foo" > though the same API. Thus, the application-layer code would have to > differ for text/html and application/xhtml+xml. Oops, I forgot to add: For these reasons, considering that the vocabulary that HTML5 defines as conforming and meaningful (i.e. excluding xml:lang in text/html which isn't meaningful) uses only NCNames, HTML5 defines a coercion onto Infoset that doesn't preserve non-NCName element or attribute names. Non-browser HTML parsers that expose an XML API may use this coercion. Absent RDFa, this isn't a problem. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/tree-construction.html#coercing-an-html-dom-into-an-infoset -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 13:09:56 UTC