- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:27:58 -0500
- To: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Cc: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Phil Archer wrote: > [Stuart Williams wrote:] > > > > If there are specific issues aspects of > > the drafts that cause you to believe there > > are architectural questions that would benefit > > from TAG review, I'm sure that we'd be happy > > to respond to a focussed request. > > Not as far as I know. The really 'controversial' stuff has long been > flagged (semantic extension to allow reg ex matching to confer class > membership, HTTP link). Thank you Phil. As incoming TAG chair, and based on your response above and the decision reached by the TAG last week (unapproved minutes at [1]), I plan not to schedule an formal TAG work on this in the forseeable future. I assume that any TAG members reading this mail who disagree with this plan will let me know. Thank you. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/01/29-minutes#item02 -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 19:28:43 UTC