- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:28:56 -0600
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
You might also consider the @rel reserved word collection at [1], as specified in the W3C RDFa Recommendation [2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax Dan Connolly wrote: > I just discovered this: > > [[ > Now, you can simply add this <link> tag to specify your preferred > version: > > <link rel="canonical" > href="http://www.example.com/product.php?item=swedish-fish" /> > ]] > -- > http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html > > > Perhaps worth updating the generic resources finding? > ISSUE-53 genericResources-53 > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/53 > > It sorta goes against our advice on follow-your-nose and > self-describing web, but I guess it's not new information, > since we considered rel="nofollow" before. > > ISSUE-51 selfDescribingWeb-51 well known formats and URI based > extensibility > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/51 > > > > See also an HTML WG issue: > ISSUE-27 rel-ownership @rel value ownership, registry consideration > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27 > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 21:29:31 UTC