- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:54:19 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com>, www-archive@w3.org
(I just sent the attached in a Reply-all, not realizing that this routed it to www-archive not www-tag. So, I'm resending.) Noah Mendelsohn 02/03/2009 11:45 AM To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> cc: "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com>, www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 Anne van Kesteren writes: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0129.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0047.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0029.html > > are the last three I could find. I agree that this is useful. Terrific, thank you. I'm told that what's been going on is that some scribes have been circulating text for minutes, and some haven't. Chairs have in any case been circulating agendas in text form, as well as checking in the HTML. I think we can settle this now. As chair, I'll make the call that we will, from now on, send both final agendas and final minutes in text form to www-tag@w3.org. How we divide the work of getting that done will be up to the TAG and doesn't need to be discussed further here. In case any TAG members are nervous, I'm willing as a fallback to say that as chair, I will undertake to email the text forms of minutes after they are approved. If other TAG members want to help sometimes, so much the better. So, unless anyone objects to that, we're all set, and I think we don't need to discuss further. Thank you to all how provided useful input on this. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> 02/03/2009 11:23 AM To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com> cc: www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:15:02 +0100, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Really? I don't think I do. Certainly not arriving on any regular > basis. > Can you send a link or two to pertinent entries in W3C mail archives, or > if that's not convenient forward one or two of the emails (to me > privately > is fine so as not to bother the list) as I need to figure out where > they've been going. Thank you! http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0129.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0047.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0029.html are the last three I could find. I agree that this is useful. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 16:55:04 UTC