- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:54:13 +0000
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Jonathan, > I care about this too. > ... > I think the procedure is that the topic gets onto a meeting agenda at > the chair's discretion, then at the meeting, after discussion, we > resolve to create an issue. Thanks a lot for this clear statement. I'll stand by and follow the progress. Please shout out in case you need a hand ;) Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> > Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:18:41 -0500 > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Question on the boundaries of content negotiation in the context > of the Web of Data > > Michael, > > I care about this too. We've been telling people that *all* > co-representations, even exotic ones like turtle and XRDS, need to > "say the same thing", without providing a piece of writing that > explains why and with what normative force. I'll get it onto the > agenda - or at least into the hopper for any discussion of TAG > priorities. > > I think the procedure is that the topic gets onto a meeting agenda at > the chair's discretion, then at the meeting, after discussion, we > resolve to create an issue. > > Jonathan > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Michael Hausenblas > <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote: >> >> TAG members, Ian, >> >> Honestly, I must admit that I'm a bit disappointed. I *thought* I've clearly >> articulated my question (and I still don't know what is missing from my side >> that I get clear answers - please let me know) and added a request for an >> issue here. In my understanding both were not addressed/answered in a >> satisfying way. I appreciate when a TAG member (thanks, Jonathan, this helps >> me feeling a bit less lost) states [1] : >> >> 'I'm as starved of citations on this subject as you are.' >> >> However, I'd really like to hear from a chair or whoever feels responsible >> if or how the TAG intents to address my question/issue. >> ...
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 13:55:00 UTC