Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

On Feb 27, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Ben Adida wrote:

> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea
> It is incorrect to use the term "erratum" to discuss a proposed major
> change to a REC with numerous implementors and deployed markup that do
> not consider this an error.

Oh, please, spare us the grief.  The TAG warned over and over and over
again that use of QNAMEs (by any name) in contexts where a URI might be
found would violate Web architecture because they interfered with the
extensibility of URI schemes.  If software breaks because of RDFa
arrogance, then so be it.


Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 03:35:22 UTC