Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

On Feb 27, 2009, at 16:31, Karl Dubost wrote:

> The operational issue that henri is talking about in his message in  
> details is *only* about "xmlns:foo" constructs.

> And *NOT* about things like the value of an attribute:

Indeed. However, the remedy of errataing RDFa to use full URIs instead  
of CURIEs would address both that issue and the rel *value* issue Mark  
Nottingham raised. (Well, at least if the full URIs used as rel tokens  
do not have upper case letters A-Z.)

Henri Sivonen

Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 14:39:59 UTC