- From: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:08:32 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- CC: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On 2/27/09 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi Noah, > > It seems to me that indeed the TAG should be actively involved, since > the primary issue here is about architectural coordination. Many have suggested that the HTML WG work on a less ambitious initial deliverable, and establish a pattern of quick iteration. This thread shows that it might not make sense to gate HTML interoperability efforts on XHTML coordination. I am not suggesting giving up on coordination, but I do think some issues will need the amount of time Ian has estimated for his document. You can Solve Any Problem... if you're willing to make the problem small enough, Rob
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:09:16 UTC