Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

On 2/27/09 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> It seems to me that indeed the TAG should be actively involved, since 
> the primary issue here is about architectural coordination.

Many have suggested that the HTML WG work on a less ambitious initial 
deliverable, and establish a pattern of quick iteration. This thread 
shows that it might not make sense to gate HTML interoperability efforts 
on XHTML coordination. I am not suggesting giving up on coordination, 
but I do think some issues will need the amount of time Ian has 
estimated for his document.

You can Solve Any Problem... if you're willing to make the problem small 
enough,

  Rob

Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 21:09:16 UTC