- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:42:43 +0100
- To: "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>, "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: elharo@metalab.unc.edu, www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:52:00 +0100, Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> wrote: > So why not write the specification and THEN propose it as a standard? http://code.google.com/p/xml5/ does have a specification (not complete, but the essentials are there) that defines how things ought to work. It also has a Python implementation of this concept. (This has been pointed out at the start of this thread...) If you want to try things out you could use: http://quuz.org/xml5/play (Please don't put any significance in the 5 by the way. It effectively is a superset of XML 1.x and Namespaces in XML 1.x that does not stop parsing when a violation of namespace well-formedness is found. XML5 was just a name I made up at the time, maybe not the best choice.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 18:44:06 UTC