Thursday, 1 April 2004
Wednesday, 31 March 2004
- Call for prototype & product presentation of Agent related Platforms, Frameworks, Systems, Applications, and Tools; as part of NODE, Sept. 27-30, 2004, Erfurt, Germany
- CfP IEEE INDIN04, Track #3: Systems Interoperability and Information Integration; Berlin, Germany, June 26-28, 2004
Saturday, 31 January 2004
Wednesday, 31 March 2004
- Re: Storing RDF in a relational database
- Re: Storing RDF in a relational database
- Re: Storing RDF in a relational database
- RDF
- Editorial on the SWIG
- Storing RDF in a relational database
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
Tuesday, 30 March 2004
- Re: German Translation of SemWeb - Deutsche Begriffe
- Re: German Translation of SemWeb - Deutsche Begriffe
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Re: German Translation of SemWeb - Deutsche Begriffe
- RE: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Announcement: RAP RDF API for PHP Version 0.71
- CFP: OTM 2004
Monday, 29 March 2004
- Re: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.
- Closed World Negation with CWM
- Last Call for Papers - ICEC04 - Deadline April 1 2004
- Re: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.
- EKAW 2004 - New deadline for paper submission
- RE: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.
- Re: public-semweb-lifesci list (was re: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.)
- public-semweb-lifesci list (was re: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.)
- Ontology generator (random discovery)
- Re: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.
- Announcing SKOS-Core 1.0 - an RDF Schema for Thesauri
- Re: Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.
Sunday, 28 March 2004
- Re: OWL tools Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Re: OWL tools Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Re: discussion list for Annotea developers
- Re: OWL tools Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- OWL tools Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Re: discussion list for Annotea developers
Saturday, 27 March 2004
- discussion list for Annotea developers
- Using RDF to describe biological taxonomy.
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
Friday, 26 March 2004
- Re: Namespaces
- RE: Programming languages
- Re: Turtle terse rdf triple language updates
- Re: Programming languages
- ANNOUNCE (again, with better formatting): The Fabl Programming Language
- ANNOUNCE: The Fabl Programming Language
- Re: Namespaces
- Semaview Announcement - iCalendar .NET parser
- Re: Namespaces
- Re: Strategies for inference over lists of values
- Re: Namespaces
- Namespaces
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- RE: Programming languages
- Re: Yet Another Tool for 20 million triples / request for data
- RE: Trix tools
- apply for jioning the mail-list
- Re: Turtle terse rdf triple language updates
- Re: Trix tools
- Re: Turtle terse rdf triple language updates
- Re: Programming languages
- RE: Programming languages
- RE: Programming languages
- Re: Turtle terse rdf triple language updates
- Re: Programming languages
- Trix tools
- Programming languages
- Yet Another Tool for 20 million triples / request for data
Thursday, 25 March 2004
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- Re: [Sesame-interest] RE: Sesame 1.0 released!
- RE: Sesame 1.0 released!
- RE: Sesame 1.0 released!
- CfP 2nd Int. German Conference on Multi-agent System Technologies (MATES'04) 29.-30. Sept. Erfurt Germany
- CfP 2nd Int. XML Database Symposium (XSym 2004) in conjunction with VLDB 2004 in Toronto, August 29-30
- RE: Tools for 20 million triples?
- RE: Sesame 1.0 released!
- Turtle terse rdf triple language updates
- ANN: Sesame 1.0 released!
- Re: URI for TriX?
- Re: URI for TriX?
- Re: URI for TriX?
- 2nd Summer School on Ontological Engineering and the Semantic Web - SSSW-04
- Re: Tools for 20 million triples?
- URI for TriX?
- Tools for 20 million triples?
Wednesday, 24 March 2004
Tuesday, 23 March 2004
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- CfP - Special Issue - Journal of IT&T - Semantic Web Technologies and Applications
- Re: A very basic question
- Re: A very basic question
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- Re: A very basic question
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- A very basic question
Monday, 22 March 2004
- RE: Funding Opportunities RSS Schema
- Funding Opportunities RSS Schema
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- ontological tool kit
Saturday, 20 March 2004
- Re: pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter
- Re: pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter
- Re: pound sign vs. slash as final URI delimiter
Friday, 19 March 2004
- RE: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml
- RDF as application/rdf+xml
- CfP: Workshop ECOOP-04: Philosophy, Ontology and Information Systems
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- RE: a bnode URI scheme?!
- RE: Assigning URIs to people
Thursday, 18 March 2004
- RE: Assigning URIs to people
- Assigning URIs to people
- RE: a bnode URI scheme?!
- new submission dates for SEMANTICS FOR GRID DATABASES
- OWL Questions
- Re: Question about header approach to URIQA and 404...
- 2nd CFP: ECAI 2004 Workshop on Application of Semantic WebTechnologies to Web Communities
Wednesday, 17 March 2004
- RE: RDF tools for mobile devices?
- ESWS2004 registration is now open
- Developers Day at WWW 2004
- RE: RDF tools for mobile devices?
- RE: RDF tools for mobile devices?
- RDF tools for mobile devices?
- Re: URIQA, schema namespaces etc.
- Re: URIQA, schema namespaces etc.
- Re: URIQA, schema namespaces etc.
- Re: URIQA, schema namespaces etc.
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- W3C Developers Day CFP
Tuesday, 16 March 2004
- SEMANTICS FOR GRID DATABASES Deadline approaching
- RE: a bnode URI scheme?!
- URIQA, schema namespaces etc.
- Re: Question about header approach to URIQA and 404...
- Re: Question about header approach to URIQA and 404...
- RE: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Question about header approach to URIQA and 404...
- DEADLINE APPROACHING: EKAW 2004 - 14th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Engineering and Management
Monday, 15 March 2004
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Javascript 'Schema-Aware' RDF Editor
- Labelling element precendence
- RE: a bnode URI scheme?!
- RE: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- WEBSA2004 Call for Papers: Second International Workshop on Web Based Systems and Applications (WEBSA2004)
Saturday, 13 March 2004
Friday, 12 March 2004
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: [more on] a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
Thursday, 11 March 2004
- Re: a bnode URI scheme?!
- Re: Write-up of SWIG
- a bnode URI scheme?!
- RDF APIs revisited
- Re: topic maps and RDF
- Re: Write-up of SWIG
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Write-up of SWIG
- Write-up of SWIG
Wednesday, 10 March 2004
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- CFP - WORKSHOP ON ONTOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS
- RE: rdf parse-able
- Scraping RDF data from spreadsheets, etc
- a general question:why RDF?
- Relationship HTML RDF
- RE: rdf parse-able
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: wishlist re MGET, DDDS, various 'about:' solutions
- wishlist re MGET, DDDS, various 'about:' solutions
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: rdf parse-able
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: rdf parse-able
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: RULE vs MGET
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- RULE vs MGET
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- Re: rdf parse-able
Tuesday, 9 March 2004
- Making MGET more GET-friendly?
- rdf parse-able
- Clustering & Semantic Web
- CFP: ACL 2004 Workshop on RDF/RDFS and OWL in Language Technology
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: Summary various 'about:' solutions (rough first cut)
- Re: HTTP Methods
- AIMSA 2004: Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, Applications
- Call for Participation - IWUC in conjunction with ICEIS'2004
Monday, 8 March 2004
- Re: Summary various 'about:' solutions (rough first cut)
- Re: HTTP Methods
- Re: Summary various 'about:' solutions (rough first cut)
- RE: "Hands Off! That Fact Is Mine"
- "Hands Off! That Fact Is Mine"
- Re: HTTP Methods
Sunday, 7 March 2004
Friday, 5 March 2004
- FOIS-2004 (Call For Papers)
- Re: Summary various 'about:' solutions (rev. 2)
- Re: topic maps and RDF
- Re: OWL Ontology Editors
- topic maps and RDF
- OWL Ontology Editors
Thursday, 4 March 2004
- Re: looking for semantic web inference tool
- Re: looking for semantic web inference tool
- looking for semantic web inference tool
- Summary various 'about:' solutions (rough first cut)
Wednesday, 3 March 2004
Tuesday, 2 March 2004
- Re: RDFQ: RDF Query in RDF
- Re: SemWeb in Guardian newspaper
- CGs for the Semantic Web: a short bibliography
- Re: RDFQ: RDF Query in RDF
- Following the lightning talk on CORESE this morning
- DDDS on URI's