- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:05:41 +0200
- To: "ext Benjamin Nowack" <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Mar 10, 2004, at 14:51, ext Benjamin Nowack wrote: > ... So if this new SemWeb phase's objective is the wide > deployment of semantic web applications (including the > metadata discovery feature), then IMHO any combination > of developer type and environment should be taken into > consideration. ... I agree. > > For a "best practice" document, I'd expect something along: > > - "if you want to relate your static html with rdf, do ..." > - "if you can read incoming http headers, you may add... and > use ... " > - "if you are familiar with url rewriting, do ..." > - "if you are writing a scutter, try a HEAD first, if there is > no metadata header, try an MGET, then ..." This kind of approach is not, in general, unpalatable to me, though I'd avoid some of the options due to architectural principles, and I would of course start with MGET first ;-) > > > hope that was helpful.. > I thought it was. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 08:05:48 UTC