- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:14:07 +0200
- To: "ext Benja Fallenstein" <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
- Cc: ext Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@asemantics.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, "ext Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
On Mar 09, 2004, at 12:43, ext Benja Fallenstein wrote: > > --DS1826181594884832854 > > > Patrick Stickler wrote: >>> -> simple/fitting the operational/organisational regimes of the >>> creators/managers of the data ? >> URIQA is. And this is proven in a global, real-world deployment >> within Nokia. > > Can you elaborate on this? I just tried to "MGET /" from > www.nokia.com, which gives me a 501 (Not Implemented), That's because URIQA is not implemented (yet) on that server. Deployment of URIQA is an ongoing process, with staggered deployment across different servers. Also, deployment within our internal intranet is more advanced than that of our publically visible servers. > while "MGET /" on sw.nokia.com works (well, it gives a 404, actually). Well, there's simply no description available for that resource. But URIQA is working just fine ;-) Try: MGET /id/cfa26f83-32b0-4c3c-9d8c-3db5a054e3f5-10252/ Guidelines_for_Game_Developers_v2_0.pdf HTTP/1.1 Host: sw.nokia.com or MGET /VOC-1/Vocabulary HTTP/1.1 Host: sw.nokia.com > Convincing the admins of an organization's main web server to adopt > the new methods is exactly what I understand Dirk is referring to -- > were you talking about something different here? Convincing admins of the acceptance of new web functionality is (in my experience) much easier than convincing modification to the DNS infrastructure. Web server functionality is typically driven by marketing policies/need, and web admins serve the owners of the web service. DNS is typically managed by a different group of admins, typically also responsible for security, etc. which tend to, how shall we say nicely, place less importance on marketing or general business needs ;-) There is a commonly encountered division between web server maintenance and network maintenance, and proposing the support of new web methods does not cross that line. Proposing the extension of DNS functionality for DDDS does cross that line, and for most folks, that means far more effort and resistance. The above comments are per my own experience. My own experience may be unique and not reflect that of a majority of others. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 2004 06:15:50 UTC