- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:31:25 +0000
- To: "Stephane Fellah" <fellah@pcigeomatics.com>, "Jamie Pitts" <jamie@semanticwave.com>, "RDF Interest Group" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 09:58 26/03/04 -0500, Stephane Fellah wrote: >I am not a heavy LISP developer, but it would be interesting to add LISP >to your list. I have the impression that LISP (a least logic programming) >will come back in a big way with the Semantic Web Phase 2. Some >initiatives such as DRS ( >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2004Jan/att-0024/DRSguide.pdf) >makes me think that we will have a Logic program based on RDF >formalization (sort of LISP program in RDF that can carried out on the web >in portable way). I think imperative language such as Java, Python are not >adequate to be used on the SW. While we're banging the drum for non-imperative approaches, there's also my experimentation with using Haskell [1]. At this time, there's nothing "industrial strength" here, but I am finding the software I've written in Haskell tends to be very solid, and, without any optimization, performs comparably with Python. #g -- [1] http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/Swish/Intro.html ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 26 March 2004 17:36:28 UTC