- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:31:14 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
* Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> [2004-03-19 17:20+0000] > > I'm wondering how many applications/systems are actually set up to serve > RDF as application/rdf+xml. A brief exploration with Google suggests that > many RDF files are currently served as text/plain or text/xml, and just a > few as application/rdf+xml. > > Is this typical? Depends how you want to count, perhaps. There are pushing 2 million RDF files served from LiveJournal as application/rdf+xml, for example. (eg. http://www.livejournal.com/users/danbri/data/foaf). Similarly from TypePad eg http://foaf.typepad.com/foaf.rdf -- in general when providers make FOAF profile documents available, they use the right type. With RSS I think the situation is more complex, and application/rss+xml or somesuch might be common. Stats from a recent RDF crawler might be interesting; Google doesn't follow RDF-to-RDF rdfs:seeAlso references... Dan
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 13:31:43 UTC