W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2004

Re: RDF as application/rdf+xml

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:31:14 -0500
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20040319183114.GT11143@homer.w3.org>

* Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> [2004-03-19 17:20+0000]
> I'm wondering how many applications/systems are actually set up to serve 
> RDF as application/rdf+xml.  A brief exploration with Google suggests that 
> many RDF files are currently served as text/plain or text/xml, and just a 
> few as application/rdf+xml.
> Is this typical?

Depends how you want to count, perhaps. There are pushing 2 million 
RDF files served from LiveJournal as application/rdf+xml, for example.
(eg. http://www.livejournal.com/users/danbri/data/foaf). Similarly from 
TypePad eg  http://foaf.typepad.com/foaf.rdf -- in general when 
providers make FOAF profile documents available, they use the right 
type. With RSS I think the situation is more complex, and
application/rss+xml or somesuch might be common.

Stats from a recent RDF crawler might be interesting; Google doesn't 
follow RDF-to-RDF rdfs:seeAlso references...

Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 13:31:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:48 UTC