- From: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:10:16 +0100
- To: "Phil Dawes" <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hi Phil, > > While we're on the trix subject, a while ago I remember seeing a > non-xml version of trix (called tris or something). > It is called TriG and described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Feb/att-0072/swig-bizer- carroll.pdf > Is this also a proposed standard? - I need a way of adding context to > ntriples (or some similarly easy to parse format) so that my web > editor can determine from which store various assertions came. Yoop, this is exactly what TriG is doing. Chris > XML > proved to be a little bit slow/overkill for parsing small amounts of > serialized rdf in javascript. > > Many thanks, > > Phil > > > Jeremy Carroll writes: > > > > > > Hi Dan > > > > can we have a bit of W3C web space for the TriX work please? > > > > We would use it for storing DTDs, XML and RDF Schemas etc. perhaps with an > > overview page pointing to some of the relevant discussion threads in SWIG > > and the working threads in www-archive > > > > If yes, please give me write permission, and ideally Patrick as well > > (although he doesn't yet have a W3C CVS account). Also, it would be good to > > know the URI by April 1, since we need to provide final copy of some > > material which will include it. > > > > > > Jeremy > > > > > > -- > > >
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2004 09:46:34 UTC