- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:51:50 +0200
- To: "Tim Nowaczyk" <zimage@cs.wisc.edu>
- Cc: "rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> I wanted avoid creating > my own vocabulary, which is why I am using rdfs:comment for the rank > and rdfs:title for the latin name. The more I think about it, the > more I'm convicted to create a vocabulary. Making use of existing vocabulary is certainly a good idea, but as soon as explanations such as "dc:title stores the latin name" are required you may be going a bit too far :-) There is an RDF version of the taxonomy data distributed along with the Uniprot protein database. It's based on the NCBI taxonomy database, but may nevertheless be of interest to you. The taxa are stored in a simple RDF file, whereas classes (Taxon, Rank), properties (scientificName, commonName, parent, child etc.) and instances (Kingdom, Phylum etc.) used to describe the taxa are defined in a separate OWL file. One interesting issue is whether individual taxa should be represented as classes or as instances. Since they are organized hierarchically using classes would seem like a natural solution as it removes the need for introducing custom parent-child properties. On the other hand we often need to reference individual taxa as in "protein x occurs in species y", which it seems works better if taxa are considered instances. OWL Full, I believe, removes the distinction between classes and individuals, but complicates things a lot otherwise... <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://uniprot.org/ontology/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xml:base="http://uniprot.org/taxonomy/" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="9606"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://uniprot.org/ontology/Taxon"/> <rank rdf:resource="http://uniprot.org/ontology/Species"/> <mnemonic>HUMAN</mnemonic> <scientificName>Homo sapiens</scientificName> <commonName>Human</commonName> <parent rdf:resource="9605"/> </rdf:Description> ... </rdf:RDF> Hope this is of use...
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 04:52:02 UTC