- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:22:16 +0100
- To: Tim Nowaczyk <zimage@cs.wisc.edu>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
An indirect answer: unfortunately, I'm offline so I can't track down the links. I vaguely recall that the zoology department at Oxford University are doing some work with RDF and/or DAML/OWL. I haven't a clue if its relevant to your question, but seems to me it's worth tracking down/checking out. [later] URI: http://www.bioimage.org/ #g -- At 22:26 26/03/04 -0600, Tim Nowaczyk wrote: >I've set this up, and I'd like your comments. I've used the ITIS >database along with some perl to describe biological taxonomy (Kingdom, >Phylum, etc..) in the style of wordnet. > >Homo Sapiens (species) >http://66.168.24.195:8081/~tim/taxonomy/0.1/tsn/180092 > >Primates (Order) >http://66.168.24.195:8081/~tim/taxonomy/0.1/tsn/180089 > >I'd like to get this to production quality. I wanted avoid creating my >own vocabulary, which is why I am using rdfs:comment for the rank >and rdfs:title for the latin name. The more I think about it, the more >I'm convicted to create a vocabulary. > >Before I go any further, I'd like your input. Is there a better way of >doing this? Is this a stupid idea that noone will ever use? I'm new to >RDF, so I need your comments. > >Thanks for your time, >Tim Nowaczyk > >-- >----------Tim Nowaczyk----------zimage@upl.cs.wisc.edu------------------ >| GPG fingerprint = 1612 3E41 D649 63ED 222D EB27 E84D 4274 392C A50A ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 07:45:01 UTC