- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@asemantics.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:35:11 +0100
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Mar 23, 2004, at 2:14 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: > > It turns out that getting Apache to serve application/rdf+xml is dead > easy. Simply adding the following line to one's .htaccess file does > the trick for *.rdf files. > > AddType application/rdf+xml .rdf You probably want to add it to your conf/mime.types as application/rdf+xml rdf RDF Rdf or add the above line to httpd.conf as ".htaccess" files have rather large performance/security downsides. While on the subject - was draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-01 ever turned into an RFC ? If that is the case them I am perfectly happy to add the above to the Apache standard distributions. Right now the last I can find is a 'Should Not' in RFC3023: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt 8.18 Application/rdf+xml Content-type: application/rdf+xml <?xml version="1.0" ?> RDF documents identified using this MIME type are XML documents whose content describes metadata, as defined by [RDF]. As a format based on XML, RDF documents SHOULD use the '+xml' suffix convention in their MIME content-type identifier. However, no content type has yet been registered for RDF and so this media type should not be used until such registration has been completed. Which makes it a bit hard for me to argue that we should put this mime type in the core apache distributions. Dw.
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 08:35:25 UTC