- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:06:48 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Interest Group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
* Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> [2004-03-27 22:20-0500] > > Hi folks, > > So it seems there are plenty of systems capable of handling lots of RDF. Are > there any that handle OWL (in some version or other) at that scale? I guess it depends what you mean by 'handle'. OWL descriptions of RDF vocabularies (such as FOAF) license inferences, ie. justify you (or your software) concluding new things from a dataset. Tools like Foafbot (http://usefulinc.com/foaf/foafbot) which are built on top of generic RDF machinery (in this case Redland) can do useful things (justified by OWL) without being complete OWL reasoners. For eg. FOAFBot's Web crawler does a bit of 'identity reasoning' based on knowing that some but not all FOAF/RDF properties are owl:InverseFunctionalProperty, ie. uniquely identifying. So the good news is that OWL support can be added incrementally. You might decide just to support an understanding of inverse properties, eg. making a system understand that foaf:depicts and foaf:depiction say that same thing as each other, just expressed inversely. The bad news is that I don't have any handy references to systems that do this sort of thing... Dan
Received on Sunday, 28 March 2004 06:06:49 UTC