- From: Vasileios Papastathis <vkpapa@iti.gr>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:30:52 +0200
- To: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>, "RDF Interest Group" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Jamie Pitts" <jamie@semanticwave.com>
Hi Jamie and Chris, Is it possible to parse RDF Schema using the RDF API for PHP V0.7 or it is only restricted to parsing RDF? It would be very interesting to investigate which of the programming languages (perl, python, php and java) can be used for RDF Schema as well. ------------------------------------------------ Mr Vasileios-Kyriakos Papastathis MSc in Advanced Computing MSc in International Management Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Informatics and Telematics Institute 1st Km. Thermi-Panorama Road P.O. Box 361, 57001 Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece tel: 2310-464160(int. 115) fax: 2310-464164 email:vkpapa@iti.gr --------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Chris Bizer Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 11:14 AM To: RDF Interest Group; Jamie Pitts Subject: Re: Programming languages Hi Jamie, > I am investigating the advantages and disadvantages of four programming > languages in developing RDF and OWL applications: perl, python, php, > and java. The main advantage of using PHP is that it is installed on 15 million web-servers (http://www.php.net/usage.php). Thus using PHP and a pure PHP RDF library, you can just drop your application on most public ISP's webservers and it is working. The disadvantage is that PHP is rather slow, compared to languages like java. Shelley Powers did a similar language comparison in her O'Reilly book "Practical RDF", but her results are outdated by now, because the APIs have developed further. An interesting up-to-date comparison of the RDF parsers for the different languages is found at http://www.w3.org/2003/11/results/rdf-core-tests Chris http://www.bizer.de http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/rdfapi/index.html
Received on Friday, 26 March 2004 05:32:35 UTC