- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:34:20 +0200
- To: "ext Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, danny666@virgilio.it, rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Firstly, I'd hope that there would be no different RDF definition of the DC vocabulary per different language -- i.e. the URIs used to denote the terms of the vocabulary would be the same, even if different language labels and descriptions might be defined for use within GUIs, etc. If there are actually different URIs defined for the Spanish terms, then you're dealing with a different vocabulary entirely, but one that simply has the same semantic coverage as the English version. If there's only one vocabulary, but different labels/descriptions defined for terms, then you've already got URI denoting the vocabulary, via which you can request the concise bounded description for that vocabulary. If you want the concise bounded description of a particular term in that vocabulary, then make a request using the URI for that term. The terms description may then include a number of labels and descriptions representing a wide range of languages. If there's multiple distinct vocabularies, then you'd ask the DC folks what the URI for the Spanish vocabulary is, and then request a description using that distinct URI. Patrick On Mar 17, 2004, at 11:17, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > > So given thet the Dublin core terms are also defined in Spanish, how > would I > get that version? And who authorises it? > > cheers > > Chaals > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Benja Fallenstein wrote: > >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Danny Ayers wrote: >> | Just a thought - what is/should be considered the Concise Bounded >> | Resource Description if the URI identifies an RDF schema/OWL >> ontology >> | namespace? >> | >> | e.g. what should an MGET on http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ return? >> >> IMHO the definition of "concise bounded description" is quite clear >> and >> schemas/ontologies are no special case. The concise bounded >> description >> of the term above would be >> >> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> >> <dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Dublin Core Element Set v1.1 namespace >> providing access to its content by means of an RDF Schema</dc:title> >> ... >> as far as I can see. >> > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 05:34:15 UTC