- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@asemantics.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:27:17 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, David Powell <djpowell@djpowell.net>
> I agree the round trip is a cost; I see no evidence to support your > argument "it is seldom necessary to give descriptions distinct > identity...". I need to do it all the time. We have the same; and > I think the extra round-trip is worth the cost, and advocate a > "Metadata-Location" header for information resources, and also a "303 this is very much why we so much like DDDS; -> go in one step from URI -> Resource OR metadata. -> One can exist without the other OR vice versa. -> They can have totally disjoint accessor methods or protocols; or multiple; i.e. HTTP for the resource and z39.50, soap/lsid or http for the metadata. Dw
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2004 16:27:18 UTC