- From: Phil Dawes <pdawes@users.sourceforge.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:41:36 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Dan Brickley writes: > > With RSS I think the situation is more complex, and > application/rss+xml or somesuch might be common. This makes sense, since (as somebody pointed out in a blog recently), RSS 1.0 can't really be considered RDF on a practical level, as most parsers rely on the structure of the xml rather than the underlying RDF triples. E.g. you can't parse it with an rdf parser, serialize back to (rdf compliant) xml and expect an rss parser to be able to read it. Cheers, Phil
Received on Monday, 22 March 2004 09:09:19 UTC