- From: Andrew Newman <andrew@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:41:19 +1000
- To: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Geoff Chappell wrote:
> How could it be wrong?
>
> If you have two statements:
>
> :_a <b> <c>
> :_b <b> <c>
>
> You have no way of knowing if _a and _b are the same as or different
> from each other, nor can you ever know (since a bnode has no globally
> usable name, you can never learn more facts about either).
>
I agree - at least without OWL. I thought what Adam wanted was someway
to remove either :_a or :_b.
With the merge example I thought you were doing just that. So it's not
okay to merge:
{[http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label] #(new Resource())
"Intellidimension Inc."}
with:
{[http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label]
[http://www.intellidimension.com] "Intellidimension Inc."}
They're [predicate, subject, object], right? You should get both
statements in the merged model.
Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 18:41:25 UTC