www-rdf-interest@w3.org from November 2001 by date

Saturday, 1 December 2001

Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Thomas B. Passin
Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Thomas B. Passin

Friday, 30 November 2001

Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Sean B. Palmer
Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Tim Berners-Lee
RE: n3/n-triples syntax question Peter Crowther
Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Sean B. Palmer
RE: n3/n-triples syntax question Peter Crowther
Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Sean B. Palmer
RE: n3/n-triples syntax question Peter Crowther
Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Seth Russell
n3/n-triples syntax question Sandro Hawke
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 29 November 2001

RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pat Hayes
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pat Hayes
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pat Hayes
Re: DAML+RDFS: potentials for simplifications? Wolfram Conen
Re: DAML+RDFS: potentials for simplifications? Wolfram Conen
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Ashok Malhotra
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Re: [jena-dev] Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Brian McBride

Wednesday, 28 November 2001

Re: [jena-dev] Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Brian McBride
Re: signing off? Dan Brickley
signing off? Julia Holden Leon
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Lars Marius Garshol
RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Mark Birbeck
RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Graham Moore
RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Peter Crowther

Tuesday, 27 November 2001

Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
RE: Triples from DAML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Triples from DAML Charlie Abela
Re: RDF web site Nikita Ogievetsky
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Seth Russell
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Thomas B. Passin

Monday, 26 November 2001

Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Thomas B. Passin
Re: Triples from DAML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Mark A Montgomery
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Graham Klyne
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Jonathan Borden
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Uche Ogbuji

Sunday, 25 November 2001

Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Roy T. Fielding
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Piotr Kaminski
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Roy T. Fielding
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Dan Brickley

Saturday, 24 November 2001

Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 23 November 2001

Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Geoff Chappell
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Web Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ(Dn) Description Logic Jeff Z. Pan
Re: RDF vs. Topic Maps/XTM? Lars Marius Garshol
SCI2002: Call for Papers by way of
Re: Triples from DAML Uche Ogbuji

Thursday, 22 November 2001

Re: Triples from DAML Sean B. Palmer

Friday, 23 November 2001

Triples from DAML Charlie Abela

Thursday, 22 November 2001

Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Thomas B. Passin
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Roland Schwaenzl
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Geoff Chappell
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Wolfram Conen
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RDF vs. Topic Maps/XTM? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
Re: use of rdf for meta-data based data capture Dmitri Colebatch
Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Uche Ogbuji
use of rdf for meta-data based data capture Dmitri Colebatch

Wednesday, 21 November 2001

Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Wolfram Conen
Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Brian McBride
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Aaron Michal
Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
CFP - Electronic Publishing - ElPub2002 Ana Alice Baptista
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
RE: ODBC driver for RDF? Geoff Chappell
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Libby Miller
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
RE: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
RE: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter Crowther
Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Johan Hjelm
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Arnold deVos
Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Uche Ogbuji
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Sandro Hawke
Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Thomas B. Passin
Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Thomas B. Passin
ODBC driver for RDF? Sandro Hawke
Re: RDFCore Update: rdfms-equivalent-representations and aboutEach Uche Ogbuji
DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Uche Ogbuji

Tuesday, 20 November 2001

Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> Brian McBride

Thursday, 1 November 2001

DAML parsing/querying Charlie Abela

Tuesday, 20 November 2001

Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A CompatibilityGuide Wolfram Conen
Fwd: RDF Graham Klyne
RE: Sorry, need help with unsubscribing. Kevin C. Rea
Sorry, need help with unsubscribing. Chuck Irvine

Monday, 19 November 2001

Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Lars Marius Garshol
Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
Re: RDF web site Andrei S. Lopatenko
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> Brian McBride
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide tarod@softhome.net
Re: RDF web site Brian McBride
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide William Loughborough
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide tarod@softhome.net
RDFCore Update: rdfms-equivalent-representations and aboutEach Brian McBride
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A CompatibilityGuide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A CompatibilityGuide Wolfram Conen
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide tarod@softhome.net
Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: RDF web site Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
[www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
IEEE Data Mining 2001: Final Call for Participation by way of
RDF web site irn bru
ISWC 2002 First Call for Papers and for Tutorials by way of
Latest release of ICS-FORTH RDFSuite by way of
logical and mnemonic model of reoccurrence Greg FitzPatrick
Prolog RDF Web descriptor prlbrs
RQL v1.0 download by way of
RQL v1.0 download Greg Karvounarakis
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Wolfram Conen
RE: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Peter Crowther
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net

Sunday, 18 November 2001

Re: Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property canhave at most one range property"] Wolfram Conen
Re: Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"] Dan Brickley
Re: Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"] Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 17 November 2001

Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"] Wolfram Conen

Friday, 16 November 2001

Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Seth Russell
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Sean B. Palmer
RE: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Peter Crowther
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Sean B. Palmer
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Libby Miller
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Sean B. Palmer
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Sean B. Palmer
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Dan Brickley
Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Sean B. Palmer
CFP: ekaw-02 ASUN Gómez-Pérez
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Sean B. Palmer
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Geoff Chappell
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Libby Miller
RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
naming properties and classes in RDF Libby Miller

Thursday, 15 November 2001

RE: <rdf:RDF> tags Danny Ayers
<rdf:RDF> tags Danny Ayers
[Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Wolfram Conen

Wednesday, 14 November 2001

Second Call for Papers: IEEE Special Issue Multimedia Content Description (Multimedia Annotation) Siegfried Handschuh
Re: UML/XMI and semantic web Arnold deVos
Re: SemWeb future ? Arnold deVos
RE: UML/XMI and semantic web Stephen Cranefield
RE: UML/XMI and semantic web Stephen Cranefield

Tuesday, 13 November 2001

RE: UML/XMI and semantic web Eric Neumann
Announce: RDFAuthor with querying Damian Steer
Re: UML/XMI and semantic web Yannis Kalfoglou
UML/XMI and semantic web oliver fodor
Re: SemWeb future ? Uche Ogbuji

Monday, 12 November 2001

RE: SemWeb future ? Uschold, Michael F
Re: RDFCore update Brian McBride
Latest release of ICS-FORTH RDFSuite Vassilis Christophides
RDFCore update Brian McBride
ANNOUNCE: Beta 2 release of RDF Gateway Geoff Chappell
Re: property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
Re: property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
SemWeb future ? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI

Friday, 9 November 2001

any pre-existing rdf schema to describe primitive data types? Y.Lei@open.ac.uk
Re: RDF statements' equivalence. Dan Pokorny
Fwd: logical and mnemonic model of reoccurrence Ralph R. Swick

Thursday, 8 November 2001

Re: RDF statements' equivalence. Thomas B. Passin
RDF statements' equivalence. Dan Pokorny

Tuesday, 6 November 2001

RE: property inference rule Danny Ayers
RE: property inference rule Peter Crowther
Re: property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
SV: property inference rule Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI

Monday, 5 November 2001

Re: property inference rule Wolfram Conen
Re: property inference rule Andrei S. Lopatenko
property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
RDFCore Update Brian McBride

Friday, 2 November 2001

Re: Deciding what to use as the fourth element of the quad Seth Russell
Deciding what to use as the fourth element of the quad Seth Russell
Stanford API (Re:) Sergey Melnik
RE: Lazy Software Peter Crowther
[www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
RE: Lazy Software William Loughborough
RE: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Dan Brickley
[www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
RE: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
RE: Lazy Software Peter Crowther

Thursday, 1 November 2001

Seeking more RDF/Triple store data Art Barstow
Lazy Software Smith Neil (Newton)
ANNOUNCE: W3C Web Ontology (WebOnt) Working Group Dan Connolly
Intro to RDFS Mark Birbeck
Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Ian Stuart
Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Dan Brickley
Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Art Barstow
Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Ian Stuart
Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Ian Stuart
Appology for SPAM [was: Re: a new way of thinking about RDF and RDF Schema] Brian McBride

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2001 23:31:09 UTC