RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot

> [integer union string] satisfies this definition.  In [integer union
> string] the lexical item "7" maps to the integer 7.
> ...
> No XML Schema datatype has a 1:N or N:N lexical-to-value map. 
>  It is not
> the presence of such datatypes that causes problems.

Thanks for clarifying this. I agree that there is no ambiguity.

Cheers,

Patrick

Received on Friday, 30 November 2001 12:19:58 UTC