- From: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:42:09 -0500
- To: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <neil.jacobs@bristol.ac.uk>, <g.conole@bristol.ac.uk>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Libby Miller" <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk> To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> Cc: <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>; <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>; <neil.jacobs@bristol.ac.uk>; <g.conole@bristol.ac.uk> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:32 AM Subject: Re: naming properties and classes in RDF > > > > I'm not sure what you consider to be redundant here. The only things that > > are typed twice are <rdf:type>, <_:1>, and <_:2>. > > Hi Peter > [...] > Does this ring any bells with anyone? I know what you mean - sometimes feels a little awkward and potentially error-prone to have a property name and a class name differing only in the capitalization of the first letter (and the range of the property being the class). Maybe some sort of other naming convention would help - a la: PResearch_interest CResearch_interest I usually just end up adorning the property name with some additional info - i.e. processingScript points to an object of type Script. > > thanks again > > libby > > Geoff
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 11:46:24 UTC