W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2001

Re: SemWeb future ?

From: Arnold deVos <adv@langdale.com.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 15:32:54 +1100
Message-ID: <00a701c16cc5$ef522620$ea01a8c0@lakes.com.au>
To: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>, "'Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI'" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>, <Y.Lei@open.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Uschold, Michael F" <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
To: "'Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI'" <jens.jakob.andersen@post.dk>;
<Y.Lei@open.ac.uk>; <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:02 AM
Subject: RE: SemWeb future ?


> Like you, I am unaware of any example applications which make serious use
> the semantic capabilities of  DAML or RDF in "real life projects". Of
> course, it depends on what you mean by real life projects. This has been
> subject of some debate on another discussion list at Yahoo.  You  might
> to check this out starting with the following link:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/semanticweb/message/88

We have a commercial product that relies on the semantic cababilties of RDF
[1]. It is used in a real-life situation by our power utility customers.  A
paper about the application of RDF to power systems [2] (and indirectly
about this product) was published at the IEEE PICA conference in Sydney this
year [3,4].

[1] http://www.langdale.com.au/Products/ibuilder.html
[2] http://www.langdale.com.au/PICA/KRforPSM.pdf
[3] http://maestro.ee.unsw.edu.au/conference/pica2001/
[4] http://www.langdale.com.au/PICA/
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 23:31:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:33 UTC