From: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> > I was telling Bijan that his n3 parser should output N-Triples, when > we came across the problem that anonymous node names (_:qname) are a > pain to generate uniquely. When you need one (eg for a [ ] > construct), you can't just make one ("_:g57"), because the user might > use the same identifier ("_:g57") later in the document. If someone is writing an N3 document, why would they want to make up their own anonymous node name ... that seems to me like a contradiction. What am I missing? Seth RussellReceived on Friday, 30 November 2001 14:35:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:33 UTC