- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:47:23 -0700
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Hi Uche, > > At 21:09 20/11/2001 -0700, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > > >[...] > > <rest> > > <List rdf:about="http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil#nil"> > > </rest> > > The rdf:about looks right to me. Its a typed node. The RDF validator at > http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ also agrees with you, once the '/''s are > added to fix the xml. Thanks. For a moment I thought I might be losing my head. It's probably worth noting why this error annoyed me so. DAML+OIL is quite nice, and a solid step up ftom the amorphous RDFS, IMO, so it's quite painful that the current examples, and even normative references have so much about them that obscures understanding. Questions such as the ones I posed and others came up as I was providing instruction on DAML to a group that stands to do very significant things with DAML. I will note, however, that I've decided to do something rather than just whinge about the state of DAML explication. Stay tuned... -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA XML strategy, XML tools (http://4Suite.org), knowledge management
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 22:55:40 UTC