- From: Peter Crowther <peter.crowther@networkinference.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 10:39:39 -0000
- To: "'Arjohn Kampman'" <akam@aidministrator.nl>, tarod@softhome.net
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, jena-dev@yahoogroups.com
> From: Arjohn Kampman [mailto:akam@aidministrator.nl] [...] > One of the reason for changing RDF Schema on this issue is that using > the conjunction view can lead to inconsistencies when combined with > multiple inheritance. A small document that we wrote about this in > April of this year can be found at: > > http://sesame.aidministrator.nl/doc/rdf-interpretation.html > > Chapter 4 is about the rdfs:domain and rdfs:range properties. > > I hope this will convince you that disjuction is the way to go, even > though it has some drawback from a modelers point-of-view. [...] Arjohn, having read the document, I assume you mean '...using the DISJUNCTION view can lead to inconsistencies...' and '...convince you that CONJUNCTION is the way to go...' above? - Peter
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 05:40:32 UTC