Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide

  I just read the paper of Wolfram Conen and Reinhold Klapsing and I
totally agree with them. About the mail sent by Peter F. Patel-Schneider...
again and again you are explaining rdfschema in function of DAML+OIL, why
the hell don't we forget DAML to explain RDFSchema. RDF and RDFSchema
doesn't need DAML to be explained and the new approach for the range/domain
semantic does not make any sense excluding DAML.


  PD: Why don't we ask Sun to add pointers to Java in order to make our
programs run faster?

Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 10:56:13 UTC