Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide from tarod@softhome.net on 2001-11-19 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from November 2001)

From: <tarod@softhome.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:21:28 GMT
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: conen@gmx.de, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-ID: <20011119152128.3203.qmail@softhome.net>

  I just read the paper of Wolfram Conen and Reinhold Klapsing and I
totally agree with them. About the mail sent by Peter F. Patel-Schneider...
again and again you are explaining rdfschema in function of DAML+OIL, why
the hell don't we forget DAML to explain RDFSchema. RDF and RDFSchema
doesn't need DAML to be explained and the new approach for the range/domain
semantic does not make any sense excluding DAML.

  Regards,
           Marc

  PD: Why don't we ask Sun to add pointers to Java in order to make our
programs run faster?

Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 10:56:13 UTC