- From: Ian Stuart <Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 01 Nov 2001 14:15:18 +0000
- To: RDF Interest list <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Thu, 2001-11-01 at 13:50, Dan Brickley wrote: > this was the problem, the rdf grammar doesn't like this mix of attributes > and content. and On Thu, 2001-11-01 at 13:43, Art Barstow wrote: > The my:field property does not conform to rule [6.12] in: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/#grammar > > If a propertyElt contains content (and it does not have > a rdf:parseType attribute), then the ONLY attribute it > can have is rdf:ID. SO, lets see if I understand this properly: As a general rule, valid RDF restricts elements to either attributes or content, but not both - as per grammar rule 6.12 (and I'm using the first option: '<' propName idAttr? '>' value '</' propName '>' - where value ::= description | string I'll re-work my larger test to suit this.. :) -- --==++ Ian Stuart: Edinburgh University Data Library. I build things: computer programs (with code); or cars (with metal) Personal web site: http://lucas.ucs.ed.ac.uk/
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2001 09:07:59 UTC