- From: <tarod@softhome.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:42:31 GMT
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I don't know, but it will be a daml solution not a rdf solution, because
there is no rdf problem with domains, at least, in my opinion.
Marc
Sean B. Palmer writes:
> > When I specify some domains I want to specify where I
> > can add this property, the property date should appear in
> > document and event.
>
> Something like:-
>
> :date rdfs:domain [ daml:unionOf (:Document :Event) ] .
>
> Perhaps? Conjunctive domains and ranges are in my experience the most
> common use, and since DAML lets you create new classes as unions of
> existing classes, there is no reason to oppose this.
>
> --
> Kindest Regards,
> Sean B. Palmer
> @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
> :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
>
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 12:17:30 UTC