- From: <tarod@softhome.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:42:31 GMT
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
I don't know, but it will be a daml solution not a rdf solution, because there is no rdf problem with domains, at least, in my opinion. Marc Sean B. Palmer writes: > > When I specify some domains I want to specify where I > > can add this property, the property date should appear in > > document and event. > > Something like:- > > :date rdfs:domain [ daml:unionOf (:Document :Event) ] . > > Perhaps? Conjunctive domains and ranges are in my experience the most > common use, and since DAML lets you create new classes as unions of > existing classes, there is no reason to oppose this. > > -- > Kindest Regards, > Sean B. Palmer > @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . > :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> . >
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 12:17:30 UTC