- From: Arjohn Kampman <akam@aidministrator.nl>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:48:52 +0100 (MET)
- To: conen@gmx.de
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> > Does that sound reasonable to you, Arjohn? > > Arjohn answered: > > I think so. I'll try to summarize for my own understanding: > > > > - On a 'local' level (i.e. disregarding super properties) both conjunction > > and disjuction interpretations are possible. So the range of a property p > > can be restricted to e.g. D1 u D2. > > > > - The range of a property is >*implicitely*< restricted to the > > conjunction of the range-restriction of the property itself and of > > its superproperties;e.g. p --range--> (D1 u D2) n C1 n C2 > > > > Is this what you were saying? > > Yes ;) (yours is much more concise though...) - only "implicit" maybe a > bit misleading (I used it too), because it is just a consequence of > subProperty and range constraint working together. (let me also > emphasize again that the question of conjunctive/disjunctive > interpretation of multiple constraints have been related to the local > level) Ok, thanks for your explanation. arjohn
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 10:50:16 UTC