W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2001

www-rdf-interest@w3.org from November 2001 by date

Saturday, 1 December 2001
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Thomas B. Passin
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Thomas B. Passin
Friday, 30 November 2001
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Sean B. Palmer
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Tim Berners-Lee
- RE: n3/n-triples syntax question Peter Crowther
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Sean B. Palmer
- RE: n3/n-triples syntax question Peter Crowther
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Sean B. Palmer
- RE: n3/n-triples syntax question Peter Crowther
- Re: n3/n-triples syntax question Seth Russell
- n3/n-triples syntax question Sandro Hawke
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Thursday, 29 November 2001
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pat Hayes
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pat Hayes
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pat Hayes
- Re: DAML+RDFS: potentials for simplifications? Wolfram Conen
- Re: DAML+RDFS: potentials for simplifications? Wolfram Conen
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Ashok Malhotra
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Re: [jena-dev] Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Brian McBride
Wednesday, 28 November 2001
- Re: [jena-dev] Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Brian McBride
- Re: signing off? Dan Brickley
- signing off? Julia Holden Leon
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Mark Birbeck
- RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Graham Moore
- RE: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Peter Crowther
Tuesday, 27 November 2001
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
- RE: Triples from DAML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Triples from DAML Charlie Abela
- Re: RDF web site Nikita Ogievetsky
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Seth Russell
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Thomas B. Passin
Monday, 26 November 2001
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Triples from DAML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Mark A Montgomery
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Graham Klyne
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Jonathan Borden
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
- Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Uche Ogbuji
Sunday, 25 November 2001
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Piotr Kaminski
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Dan Brickley
Saturday, 24 November 2001
- Namespaces wihtout "#" Was: Few CWM Bugs Tim Berners-Lee
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Friday, 23 November 2001
- Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Geoff Chappell
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- Web Ontology Reasoning in the SHOQ(Dn) Description Logic Jeff Z. Pan
- Re: RDF vs. Topic Maps/XTM? Lars Marius Garshol
- SCI2002: Call for Papers by way of
- Re: Triples from DAML Uche Ogbuji
Thursday, 22 November 2001
- Re: Triples from DAML Sean B. Palmer
Friday, 23 November 2001
- Triples from DAML Charlie Abela
Thursday, 22 November 2001
- Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Roland Schwaenzl
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Geoff Chappell
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Wolfram Conen
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RDF vs. Topic Maps/XTM? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
- Re: use of rdf for meta-data based data capture Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Uche Ogbuji
- use of rdf for meta-data based data capture Dmitri Colebatch
Wednesday, 21 November 2001
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Wolfram Conen
- Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Brian McBride
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Aaron Michal
- Cutting the Patrician datatype knot Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- CFP - Electronic Publishing - ElPub2002 Ana Alice Baptista
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- RE: ODBC driver for RDF? Geoff Chappell
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Libby Miller
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- RE: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
- RE: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Peter Crowther
- Re: Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? Arjohn Kampman
- Domain/Range: conjuntion or disjuntion?? tarod@softhome.net
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Johan Hjelm
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Arnold deVos
- Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Uche Ogbuji
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Sandro Hawke
- Re: ODBC driver for RDF? Thomas B. Passin
- Re: DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Thomas B. Passin
- ODBC driver for RDF? Sandro Hawke
- Re: RDFCore Update: rdfms-equivalent-representations and aboutEach Uche Ogbuji
- DAML+OIL and the nested element conundrum Uche Ogbuji
Tuesday, 20 November 2001
- Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
- Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> Brian McBride
Thursday, 1 November 2001
- DAML parsing/querying Charlie Abela
Tuesday, 20 November 2001
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A CompatibilityGuide Wolfram Conen
- Fwd: RDF Graham Klyne
- RE: Sorry, need help with unsubscribing. Kevin C. Rea
- Sorry, need help with unsubscribing. Chuck Irvine
Monday, 19 November 2001
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
- Re: RDF web site Andrei S. Lopatenko
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> Brian McBride
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide tarod@softhome.net
- Re: RDF web site Brian McBride
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide William Loughborough
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide tarod@softhome.net
- RDFCore Update: rdfms-equivalent-representations and aboutEach Brian McBride
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A CompatibilityGuide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A CompatibilityGuide Wolfram Conen
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide tarod@softhome.net
- Re: [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
- Re: [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: RDF web site Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
- [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
- IEEE Data Mining 2001: Final Call for Participation by way of
- RDF web site irn bru
- ISWC 2002 First Call for Papers and for Tutorials by way of
- Latest release of ICS-FORTH RDFSuite by way of
- logical and mnemonic model of reoccurrence Greg FitzPatrick
- Prolog RDF Web descriptor prlbrs
- RQL v1.0 download by way of
- RQL v1.0 download Greg Karvounarakis
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Wolfram Conen
- RE: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Peter Crowther
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
Sunday, 18 November 2001
- Re: Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property canhave at most one range property"] Wolfram Conen
- Re: Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"] Dan Brickley
- Re: Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Saturday, 17 November 2001
- Integrity Checking vs. Typing [Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property"] Wolfram Conen
Friday, 16 November 2001
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Seth Russell
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Sean B. Palmer
- RE: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Peter Crowther
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Sean B. Palmer
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Libby Miller
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Sean B. Palmer
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Sean B. Palmer
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Dan Brickley
- Re: RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" Sean B. Palmer
- CFP: ekaw-02 ASUN Gómez-Pérez
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Sean B. Palmer
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Geoff Chappell
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Libby Miller
- RDFS bug "A property can have at most one range property" tarod@softhome.net
- Re: naming properties and classes in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- naming properties and classes in RDF Libby Miller
Thursday, 15 November 2001
- RE: <rdf:RDF> tags Danny Ayers
- <rdf:RDF> tags Danny Ayers
- [Paper:] Logical Interpretations of RDFS - A Compatibility Guide Wolfram Conen
Wednesday, 14 November 2001
- Second Call for Papers: IEEE Special Issue Multimedia Content Description (Multimedia Annotation) Siegfried Handschuh
- Re: UML/XMI and semantic web Arnold deVos
- Re: SemWeb future ? Arnold deVos
- RE: UML/XMI and semantic web Stephen Cranefield
- RE: UML/XMI and semantic web Stephen Cranefield
Tuesday, 13 November 2001
- RE: UML/XMI and semantic web Eric Neumann
- Announce: RDFAuthor with querying Damian Steer
- Re: UML/XMI and semantic web Yannis Kalfoglou
- UML/XMI and semantic web oliver fodor
- Re: SemWeb future ? Uche Ogbuji
Monday, 12 November 2001
- RE: SemWeb future ? Uschold, Michael F
- Re: RDFCore update Brian McBride
- Latest release of ICS-FORTH RDFSuite Vassilis Christophides
- RDFCore update Brian McBride
- ANNOUNCE: Beta 2 release of RDF Gateway Geoff Chappell
- Re: property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
- Re: property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
- SemWeb future ? Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
Friday, 9 November 2001
- any pre-existing rdf schema to describe primitive data types? Y.Lei@open.ac.uk
- Re: RDF statements' equivalence. Dan Pokorny
- Fwd: logical and mnemonic model of reoccurrence Ralph R. Swick
Thursday, 8 November 2001
- Re: RDF statements' equivalence. Thomas B. Passin
- RDF statements' equivalence. Dan Pokorny
Tuesday, 6 November 2001
- RE: property inference rule Danny Ayers
- RE: property inference rule Peter Crowther
- Re: property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
- SV: property inference rule Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
Monday, 5 November 2001
- Re: property inference rule Wolfram Conen
- Re: property inference rule Andrei S. Lopatenko
- property inference rule Nikita Ogievetsky
- RDFCore Update Brian McBride
Friday, 2 November 2001
- Re: Deciding what to use as the fourth element of the quad Seth Russell
- Deciding what to use as the fourth element of the quad Seth Russell
- Stanford API (Re:) Sergey Melnik
- RE: Lazy Software Peter Crowther
- [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
- RE: Lazy Software William Loughborough
- RE: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Dan Brickley
- [www-rdf-interest] <none> tarod@softhome.net
- RE: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- RE: Lazy Software Peter Crowther
Thursday, 1 November 2001
- Seeking more RDF/Triple store data Art Barstow
- Lazy Software Smith Neil (Newton)
- ANNOUNCE: W3C Web Ontology (WebOnt) Working Group Dan Connolly
- Intro to RDFS Mark Birbeck
- Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Ian Stuart
- Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Dan Brickley
- Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Art Barstow
- Re: Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Ian Stuart
- Trying to understand valid RDF [long] Ian Stuart
- Appology for SPAM [was: Re: a new way of thinking about RDF and RDF Schema] Brian McBride

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2001 23:31:09 UTC
Archived on: Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:33 UTC