www-forms@w3.org from September 2006 by date

Friday, 29 September 2006

• XForms and XML international markup Elliotte Harold

Thursday, 28 September 2006

• FYI: application/www-form-urlencoded Bjoern Hoehrmann

Wednesday, 27 September 2006

• Presentation on XQuery and XForms Mark Birbeck

Friday, 22 September 2006

• Re: A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Victor Bolshov
• Re: A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Mark Birbeck
• Re: xforms-value-changed Victor Bolshov
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Jason
• Re: A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Victor Bolshov
• RE: multiple instance/model submission Francisco Monteiro
• Re: xforms-value-changed Mark Birbeck
• Re: A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Mark Birbeck
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Mark Birbeck
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Jason
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Jason
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Erik Bruchez
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Jason
• Re: multiple instance/model submission Victor Bolshov
• multiple instance/model submission Jason
• Re: A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Victor Bolshov

Thursday, 21 September 2006

• XForms 1.0 Second Edition Errata Document Updates John Boyer
• RE: A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Klotz, Leigh
• A possibility to bind XMLSchema to <instance> element, not only to <model>. What do you think? Victor Bolshov
• xforms-value-changed Victor Bolshov

Wednesday, 20 September 2006

• RE: Feedback on 1.1: Case element content model and attributes Francisco Monteiro

Tuesday, 19 September 2006

• Re: Feedback on 1.1: Case element content model and attributes John Boyer
• Re: Feedback on 1.1: instance src attribute broken John Boyer
• instance submission Jason
• Re: Feedback on 1.1: instance src attribute broken Mark Birbeck

Monday, 18 September 2006

• Re: Feedback on 1.1: instance src attribute broken John Boyer
• RE: Nested repeat and xf:delete question ... Klotz, Leigh
• Re: Notice of publication of errata for XForms 1.0 Second Edition Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Nested repeat and xf:delete question ... John Boyer
• Re: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute John Boyer
• Nested repeat and xf:delete question ... Sébastien CRAMATTE
• Re: Notice of publication of errata for XForms 1.0 Second Edition Elliotte Harold
• Re: Feedback on 1.1: Determining the case of a switch Erik Bruchez
• Re: Feedback on 1.1: Case element content model and attributes Erik Bruchez
• Re: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute Erik Bruchez

Tuesday, 12 September 2006

• Re: xsd -> xhtml Jan J Kratky
• xsd -> xhtml Anthony Ettinger
• RE: Feedback on 1.1: Case element content model and attributes Rafael Benito

Monday, 11 September 2006

• RE: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute Klotz, Leigh
• Re: Feedback on 1.1: instance src attribute broken Mark Birbeck
• Re: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute Mark Birbeck
• RE: Feedback on 1.1: Case element content model and attributes Francisco Monteiro
• Feedback on 1.0: Error on user interface controls John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.1: Determining the case of a switch John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.1: Case element content model and attributes John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.1: parse-error, xforms-submit-error, and xforms-link-exception John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.0/1.1: Meaning of action elements in repeated content John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.1: make submission attribute optional on submit and send elements John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.1: instance src attribute broken John Boyer
• Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute John Boyer
• Feedback on 1.0: Behavior of nodesets when inserting or deleting nodes John Boyer
• Feedback for XForms 1.1: message action John Boyer

Friday, 8 September 2006

• Fixing xforms-refresh John Boyer
• Re: A forms-lite straw man John Boyer
• RE: multiple datatypes on a single bound node Francisco Monteiro

Thursday, 7 September 2006

• RE: multiple datatypes on a single bound node Klotz, Leigh

Wednesday, 6 September 2006

• Re: A forms-lite straw man John Boyer
• Re: A forms-lite straw man John Boyer
• Re: A forms-lite straw man John Boyer
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Mark Birbeck
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Henri Sivonen
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivedesigners.com
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Lachlan Hunt
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• RE: A forms-lite straw man Klotz, Leigh

Tuesday, 5 September 2006

• Re: A forms-lite straw man John Boyer
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Dave Raggett
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Henri Sivonen
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Dave Raggett
• Re: A forms-lite straw man John Boyer
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Dave Raggett
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• Re: A forms-lite straw man Lachlan Hunt
• RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Dharmesh Mistry
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Elliotte Harold
• A forms-lite straw man Dave Raggett
• Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2 Dave Raggett
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Francisco Monteiro
• RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Dharmesh Mistry

Monday, 4 September 2006

• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Doug Schepers
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2 Mark Baker
• Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2 Henri Sivonen
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• Re: some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Steven Pemberton
• RE: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2 Sikora, Gary
• some technical thoughts about incremental improvements to forms Dave Raggett
• RE: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2 Francisco Monteiro
• tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2 Mark Seaborne

Sunday, 3 September 2006

• Re: XHTML and MIME Colin Paul Adams
• Re: XHTML and MIME Lachlan Hunt

Saturday, 2 September 2006

• Re: XHTML and MIME Henri Sivonen
• Re: XHTML and MIME Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHTML and MIME Anne van Kesteren
• XForms + Web Forms 2.0 = WICD Francisco Monteiro

Friday, 1 September 2006

• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 John Boyer
• Re: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Mark Seaborne
• Re: XHTML and MIME John Boyer
• RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Kugelman, John
• Re: XHTML and MIME L. David Baron
• Re: XHTML and MIME Anne van Kesteren
• RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XHTML and MIME T.V Raman
• RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Francisco Monteiro
• Re: XHTML and MIME Mark Birbeck
• Re: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Mark Birbeck
• RE: XHTML and MIME Doug Schepers
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Elliotte Harold
• RE: XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Dharmesh Mistry
• Re: XHTML and MIME Henri Sivonen
• XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Francisco Monteiro
• Re: XHTML and MIME Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML and MIME Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML and MIME Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHTML and MIME Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHTML and MIME Henri Sivonen
• Re: XHTML and MIME Mark Birbeck
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Henri Sivonen
• Re: XHTML and MIME Anne van Kesteren
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Henri Sivonen
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Lachlan Hunt
• RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Francisco Monteiro
• RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Doug Schepers
• RE: XHTML and MIME (was: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0) Doug Schepers
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML and MIME L. David Baron

Last message date: Friday, 29 September 2006 14:16:49 UTC