- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:52:52 -0700
- To: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFE46DAE72.12BFB0D1-ON882571ED.006224E1-882571ED.00623AE2@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Erik, It already says something along these lines, so perhaps nothing more needs to be said after all. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist Co-Chair, W3C XForms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/software/ Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org 09/18/2006 06:09 AM To www-forms@w3.org cc Subject Re: Feed back on 1.0: Meaning of incremental attribute John Boyer wrote: > > In Xforms 1.0, the description of the incremental attribute is inadequate. I agree with this part of the post. > I think that it could be described > though that incremental="true" means that each modification of the UI > control by the user is committed to data. I disagree with "each" here: a user may be typing fast in an input or text field, and committing data upon each keystroke may have negative performance implications. This is particularly true if your XForms engine is distributed between client and server, where latency makes it even more impractical to send each and every keystroke to the server. I think it would be reasonable to say that changes should be committed "from time to time", so as to give the user the perception that changes are taken into account immediately, but not necessarily upon each keystroke. -Erik -- Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Received on Monday, 18 September 2006 17:53:03 UTC